Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:14:10 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: scratch65535@att.net, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! Message-ID: <73E2F71C-0C7E-49A3-8D98-3AECA8F40F99@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <20170209161249.GL2092@kib.kiev.ua> References: <dvvl9chf9h22dpjto35d44enid819p9rnc@4ax.com> <h91m9cpbmp6js1km1bson74he5uuui9r6h@4ax.com> <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <ndjm9cl4samqgioi25ro8p2q6liimvr1h4@4ax.com> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <AE0D514C-D235-462D-B31D-66FC619D9F4D@lastsummer.de> <20170209161249.GL2092@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 9 Feb 2017, at 5:12 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:30:20PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: >> FreeBSD package management makes an ABI promise in the form of >> "FreeBSD:10:amd64", but not even pkg code itself adheres to this, >> and thus we have had subtle and yet fatal breakage in 10.2 and 10.3. > Stop spreading FUD. There is no ABI breakage on stable/10 branch, > nor there is a breakage in the package sets. We only promise > backward-compatibility, and this works as advertized. A binary compiled > on later system, is not guaranteed to work on the early system even on > the same branch. > > The current package set for stable/10 is built on 10.3 and is only > guaranteed to work on 10.3 and later. Trying to make arbitrary > combinations of binaries and base systems outside of the scope of the > project. You're contradicting yourself here. Either it's compatible or it isn't? Cheers, Franco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73E2F71C-0C7E-49A3-8D98-3AECA8F40F99>