From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 5 10:30:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA04299 for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04273 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id JAA19629 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA09349; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 09:22:58 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609051622.JAA09349@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 09:22:58 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, rkw@dataplex.net, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <544.841904110@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Sep 5, 96 08:15:10 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >Be prepared to revisit this discussion every 3-4 months, as we have > >for several years now, then, for the same reasons: tabling an issue > >does not resolve it. > > Just like raising it every 3-4 months doesn't make it valid. If it's invalid, then resolve it by proving it is invalid, and that the code does in fact build, or that the should, in fact, not be reasonably expected to build. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.