From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 19 18:45:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED6416A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jinx.unknown.nu (jinx.unknown.nu [66.90.81.43])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0D43D31
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from lists@unknown.nu)
Received: by jinx.unknown.nu (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id F06024122; Wed, 19 May 2004 20:45:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jinx.unknown.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE51640CD;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 20:45:28 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 20:45:28 -0500 (CDT)
From: Kim Scarborough <lists@unknown.nu>
X-X-Sender: sluggo@jinx.unknown.nu
To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org>
In-Reply-To: <40ABC562.1020006@elvandar.org>
Message-ID: <20040519204422.M7180@jinx.unknown.nu>
References: <40ABBDB0.4050907@unknown.nu> <40ABC562.1020006@elvandar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: devel/camlp4 deletion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Kim Scarborough <sluggo@unknown.nu>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 01:45:40 -0000

> Well, personally i think that should be okay, is it possible to ask
> someone then when the new "ocaml" is scheduled to be released?
> If the ocaml is abandoned, or stopped for unknown time you know the
> status including us.

Good idea. I've sent a note to the developer.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Scarborough                                      http://www.unknown.nu/kim/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------