From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 19:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D84E106564A for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mloftis@wgops.com) Received: from juggler.wgops.com (juggler.wgops.com [204.11.247.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597AB8FC1B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by juggler.wgops.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8A933A8119; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:33:44 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on juggler.wgops.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (host-72-174-42-38.msl-mt.client.bresnan.net [72.174.42.38]) by juggler.wgops.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51373A8092 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:33:42 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:33:48 -0600 From: Michael Loftis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1935DF0278C55632AE1FC907@[192.168.1.100]> In-Reply-To: <20100422085954.GA10035@duncan.reilly.home> References: <4BCFF881.9000809@minibofh.org> <20100422085954.GA10035@duncan.reilly.home> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at juggler X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: gmirror(8) rebuild speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:33:45 -0000 --On Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:59 PM +1000 Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >> I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed. >> Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages. > > To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea? The last thing you need is for a RAID rebuild to make the machine unusable. It's probably going to impact perfomance somewhat. Being able to decide if it's more important to rebuild, or serve data, is a better way to go.