Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:46:51 +0000 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?=28=E2=80=A2=E2=80=BF=E2=80=A2=29__Dh?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=A9nin_Jean-Jacques?=" <dhenin@gmail.com> To: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs Message-ID: <b11213c3-3dcd-0f7a-f2bc-4d6a838fcf14@mixmax.com> In-Reply-To: <CAO%2BPfDd%2Brr94CsQrcA67QJz29dP9=8hjqvdjHyO2HKcysvRQGA@mail.gmail.com> References: <6470061F-3127-4CD8-BB14-EB46D46B0BF1@mail.sermon-archive.info> <23c8bfcb-5112-accb-6607-3448104d5a0f@holgerdanske.com> <17E1B6D8-4BC6-4698-8E5C-7EFF7CD7E31F@mail.sermon-archive.info> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1609290653420.7457@wonkity.com> <CAO%2BPfDd%2Brr94CsQrcA67QJz29dP9=8hjqvdjHyO2HKcysvRQGA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 2:24 PM, David Demelier demelier.david@gmail.com wrote: 2016-09-29 14:57 GMT+02:00 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: > >>> p.s. I learned CVS from = an earlier version of this book. The current >>> edition (3 e.) is = available as a PDF download: >>> >>> http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/ >> >> >> Thank you for the detailed response. It makes sense now. I am in the >> middle of working my way through that book. I should have asked about = this >> years ago. > > > Subversion is the modern successor to CVS. The= book on it is on the same > site: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ > Well, subversion is the IE6 of version controlindeed ? https://subversion.apache.org/ -------------------------------------------= -------------- (V)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Dh=C3=A9nin Jean-Jacques ( ..)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 48, rue de la Justice 78300 Poissy c(')(')=C2=A0 dhenin@gmail.com --------------------------------------------= ------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Sep 30 13:48:31 2016 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAC9C024A0 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from oceanview.tundraware.com (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oceanview.tundraware.com", Issuer "oceanview.tundraware.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48F2AF8 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by oceanview.tundraware.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8UDm06w062145 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:48:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> Subject: [Mildly OT] Userland Control Of getbostbyname() Message-ID: <a0681443-0282-48ac-5884-6d1f3868787a@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:47:55 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (oceanview.tundraware.com [45.55.60.57]); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:48:01 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: u8UDm06w062145 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:48:32 -0000 Is it possible to control *which* DNS server (and port) a userland program queries for DNS resolution when doing gethosbyname() and gethostbyip() calls? dig and nslookup seem capable of defining the DNS server to query, but I don't know if they're doing the call directly or via the gethostby... calls. In a perfect world, I'd get a solution to this that was language agnostic - a way to tell my userland programs - in C, Java, Python, perl, go ... always use this server:port when doing name resolution. TIA, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b11213c3-3dcd-0f7a-f2bc-4d6a838fcf14>