From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Apr 10 1:44: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from merton.slipstreams.net (owirc.com [208.45.226.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE48137B424 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:44:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kupek@earthlink.net) Received: from arcane (arcane.slipstreams.net [192.168.1.1]) by merton.slipstreams.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f3A107B10836; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:00:08 GMT (envelope-from kupek@earthlink.net) From: "Scott" To: "Kal Torak" Cc: Subject: RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:43:00 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3ACB4416.61A31902@quake.com.au> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kal Torak wrote: > Infact I dont even see how anyone could call network scanning a crime... > Its just like knocking on someones door to see if they are home, are we > going to make that a crime as well? This analogy has been made before, but network scanning isn't like knocking on someones door. Attempting to access an IP using Internet Explorer on port 80 is like knocking on someones door. Port/Network scanning amounts to going to someones house, peering in all of the windows, testing the door to see if its unlocked, and seeing if the attic vent was left open on accident. This definitely should be illegal IMO... Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message