From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 6 18:46: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lince.tdnet.com.br (lince.tdnet.com.br [200.236.148.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CB037BA30 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 18:46:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kernel@tdnet.com.br) Received: from tdnet.com.br [200.236.148.100] by lince.tdnet.com.br with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.00) id A167B9650160; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 21:52:55 -0300 Message-ID: <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 22:41:16 +0000 From: Gustavo V G C Rios X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Considering the current kernel design approach used by traditional system, what happens if a drive were wrongly coded ? Would the entiry system crash ? -- If you're happy, you're successful. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message