From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 17 7:54:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1DD37B409 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA29367; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:59:02 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <200109171459.SAA29367@aaz.links.ru> Subject: Re: importing xemacs-21.4 In-Reply-To: <20010917071401.A50292@johncoop.MSHOME> from "John Merryweather Cooper" at "Sep 17, 1 07:14:01 am" To: john_m_cooper@yahoo.com (John Merryweather Cooper) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:59:02 +0400 (MSD) Cc: garyj@jennejohn.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: .@babolo.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Merryweather Cooper writes: > On 2001.09.17 01:02 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Let me put the question in a different manner: > > > > Does anyone care if I replace xemacs21.1.14 with xemacs21.4.4 in the > > xemacs21 > > port ? Speak up now or forever hold your peace. > > > > -- > > Gary Jennejohn garyj@jennejohn.org gj@freebsd.org > > > Putting xemacs21.4.4 in an xemacs21-devel is one thing, replacing the > current xemacs21 is quite another. > > Put my vote in that this is a bad idea. The current xemacs21 works > quite well for me, and I don't want to be an involuntary beta tester > for 21.4. YMMV. Me too -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message