Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 08:33:02 -0500 From: Eric Gunther <egunther@warwick.net> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: built xorg-server, what next? Message-ID: <1417440782.13693.1.camel@warwick.net> In-Reply-To: <201412010853.sB18r15i018741@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201412010853.sB18r15i018741@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 00:53 -0800, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >Subject: Re: built xorg-server, what next? > >From: Eric Gunther <egunther@warwick.net> > >To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org > >Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:54:05 -0500 > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Not too confident about this but maybe this is your problem. > > Below, Xorg.0.log shows that dri, dri2, > >and glx will be loaded. > > While it seems from your xorg.conf that you wanted them to not be loaded. > > > > X.Org Server Extension : 6.0 > >[175580.806] (WW) "dri" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. > >[175580.806] (WW) "dri2" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. > >[175580.806] (WW) "glx" will not be loaded unless you've specified it to be loaded elsewhere. > >[175580.807] (II) "extmod" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. > >[175580.807] (II) "dbe" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. > >[175580.807] (II) "glx" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. > >[175580.807] (II) "record" will be loaded by default. > >[175580.807] (II) "dri" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. > >[175580.808] (II) "dri2" will be loaded even though the default is to disable it. > > > > > >Section "Module" > > Load "dbe" > > Disable "dri" > > Disable "dri2" > > Disable "glx" > > SubSection "extmod" > > Option "omit xfree86-dga" > > EndSubSection > > > >Section "ServerFlags" > > Option "AIGLX" "false" > > Option "NoAccel" "True" > > Option "NoDRI" "True" > > Option "DRI" "False" > > Option "DRI2" "False" > >EndSection > > Yes, I noticed that. However, not sure what else > I can do. Seems X thinks these modules really > must be loaded. Don't know why. > Perhaps these three are required by some othe module? > Or perhaps these are really necessary for X to work? > > >Also, in the xdm log, is the use of the file Xsetup_0 unusual? > > > >xdm info (pid 843): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 > > No, that is normal. > However, on amd64 I see 2 more lines: > > xdm info (pid 1029): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 > xdm info (pid 1029): sourcing /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole > xdm info (pid 1038): executing session /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession > > So it seems xdm is stuck on Xsetup_0 and > does not get to GiveConsole at all. > > Xsetup_0 just launches xconsole: > > % cat /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 > #!/bin/sh > xconsole -geometry 480x130-0-0 -daemon -notify -verbose -fn fixed -exitOnFail > % > > which does come up fine. > > Thanks for the hints > > Anton > Your welcome, and I saw that you seemed to have solved it... maybe I sent you on the right path. Have a good day, --e
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1417440782.13693.1.camel>