From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 15 09:26:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D9B16A4CE for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 09:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from secure.tummy.com (secure.tummy.com [66.35.36.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE45943D53 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 09:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spampit-discard@tummy.com) Received: by secure.tummy.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7DE4F8053F5A; Sun, 15 May 2005 03:26:16 -0600 (MDT) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: spampit-discard@tummy.com Date: 15 May 2005 09:26:16 -0000 Message-Id: <20050515092616.7DE4F8053F5A@secure.tummy.com> Subject: Confirmation Request (was: Verbrechen der deutschen Frau) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:26:18 -0000 Read below for instructions on getting your message past my spam pit. Your message with the subject: Verbrechen der deutschen Frau has been marked as spam by our spam filter. Unfortunately, we get an average of over a thousand spams per day per person at tummy.com. In order to allow us to quickly respond to our clients problems, we have had to set up automated spam processing. In most cases, this does not require any work from our users. In some rare cases, a legitimate e-mail does get caught by our system. This has happened to your message above. You may request that our system complete delivery of this message by send an empty message to: spampit-confirm-10bf428715b81de5796c@tummy.com Please accept my appologies that you have had to go through this extra step. I have my spam filter configured so that most legitimate e-mail comes through without requiring confirmation. Once in a great while, however, it mis-classifies mail (usually when someone is forwarding a piece of spam). If you did not send an e-mail to me with the above subject, it may have due to a spammer forging your e-mail address in an attempt to get an email through to me. See the headers below for more information on the message that generated this response. ======================= Original headers follow ======================= Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by secure.tummy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA098053F4C for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 03:26:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from bag.python.org (bag.python.org [194.109.207.14]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4F9OYeZ015936; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:24:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-isp@freebsd.org) Received: by bag.python.org (Postfix) id 439321E405C; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:24:34 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: webmaster-folks@bag.python.org Received: from bag.python.org (bag [127.0.0.1]) by bag.python.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331081E4037; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:24:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bag (HELO bag.python.org) (127.0.0.1) by bag.python.org with SMTP; 15 May 2005 11:24:33 +0200 Received: from eyuch.org (pool-71-100-123-26.tampfl.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.100.123.26]) by bag.python.org (Postfix) with SMTP; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:24:32 +0200 (CEST) From: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org To: pythonmac-sig@python.org Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:24:31 UTC Subject: Verbrechen der deutschen Frau Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <9c263d.c41af6f7ce@hkagfnp.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name * 0.2 INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) * 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO * 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% * [cf: 100] * 0.1 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) * 1.4 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/) * 0.2 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check * 1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority, but no X-Mailer/User-Agent X-Spam-Level: ****