From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 21:29:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6522E16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:29:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAF343D2F for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@vicor.com) Received: from vicor.com (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673307A425; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:29:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41CB38A7.5020700@vicor.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:29:11 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: VICOR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lennart Augustsson , Matthew Dillon , usb@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: USB vendore designations.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:29:12 -0000 Lennart, Matt, Barry, USB hackers, On FreeBSD we have added vendor descriptiosn fo teh form XYZ electrical corp. where on NetBSD the same ID may be described as "XYZ" Is there a reason to go one way or the other? I'd rather not be different for no reason, but I'm loath to just discard information. thoughts?