From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 12 12:55:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF9216A418 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099C413C457 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JOufo-0000aE-Do for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:44 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:44 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:44 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:57:20 +0100 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <47B195EF.9060603@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig43EFAB6CBACA376A288C6C68" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <47B195EF.9060603@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: does this error message mean anything bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig43EFAB6CBACA376A288C6C68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Limiting closed port RST response from 266 to 200 packets/second. It usually means someone (on a fast or local network) is doing a portscan or a similar activity on the machine. In itself, it's nothing bad, but it depends on your opinion about portscans. But it can also mean that a often-used service on the machine (like http or a database server) is down and you're getting a lot of failed connection requests from clients. --------------enig43EFAB6CBACA376A288C6C68 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHsZexldnAQVacBcgRAnzDAJ0Xb3rm5mOe3mUYFYopPXW27LjLIgCfZF0c DzyUBFgpxsUhylUuicEGGPE= =akSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig43EFAB6CBACA376A288C6C68--