From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  7 12:35:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A07E221
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 May 2014 12:35:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07C3D1B9
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 May 2014 12:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i17so985620qcy.11
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=Tmv74I20bh0GXu5VgnW7onAlY0Hj/7p4mbDaOUvolEQ=;
 b=kwUL217EV8rnCEWhaVQgRCwidXeZHGfVgn32oX9WMXZK/uy2p8XjhJ9RGxrZAfDyO1
 p69Mr1kbS2m54SRqX3qO+ynwadSphawtrnleCV7oSE7AOFSwKwt2/KUREPU9ntK6Fazx
 VGJ7OPkKs7usILamIo+O/JtuKuBSRo2/sj9TLeuPpjemxhfuqeatb7qMdvBB2Qy/c+hI
 oHfLLkoNIZLF6Bz50iYHPYVyIBzIGaZ9uMLnwf9PcAZ3nkFHK4X+1rH4RLyLEBvi3u0+
 wNc2+3PGZ36tAsjrYGubFlNhxFpBENXo71hmwfGR6cLT1tuUiP9NX4nmRKCnnZ3kDVB+
 kq7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.91.161 with SMTP id z30mr59532647qgd.65.1399466138181;
 Wed, 07 May 2014 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.232.74 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABfVBTnn2zokwmCzigy11gaQskWPPWQenrOrZxKmQZ+Kgx=hDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABfVBT=5Nku2UYQyaTbg+tgTo+R6ZjOdgqaCFcM-WarvndigSQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGQ6iC_zrYefr4gDQPt31z6aErrd6hBrM4zHc7zKAPq9rzMCFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hQ2+gmQNb+=rzCMWG4ms76trhgQSTGh+crmwokgNPPj+ZNxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABfVBTnn2zokwmCzigy11gaQskWPPWQenrOrZxKmQZ+Kgx=hDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 17:05:38 +0430
Message-ID: <CABfVBTkKejueVBJa=zmNEvO1MVOOVVDOZ_Y-_a__=BLUBUpbDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: running netmap-ipfw with real NICs
From: Mahnaz Talebi <mhnz.talebi@gmail.com>
To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:35:39 -0000

Sorry for my inaccuracy!
I use "./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f tx"  in sender and "
./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f rx" in receiver.


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Mahnaz Talebi <mhnz.talebi@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> I use this scenario for test netmap-based ipfw with real NICs.
>
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
> sender (eth0:10.10.1.1)                DUT (eth0:10.10.1.2)
> (eth1:10.10.2.2)            receiver(10.10.2.3:eth0)
> ./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f rx   ------------->    ./kipfw netmap:eth0
> netmap:eth1  --------------> ./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f tx
> where sender and receiver connect to DUT directly.
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
> I think that kipfw capture packets from DUT's eth0 (which come from
> sender's eth0) and forward them to it's eth1 (which connect directly to
> receiver's eth0), after apply policies from ipfw/ipfw.
> I expect that see packets that pass the ipfw's policies in receiver.
>
> Is this scenario and my expects true?!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Raimundo Santos <raitech@gmail.com>wrot=
e:
>>
>>> On 28 April 2014 01:58, Mahnaz Talebi <mhnz.talebi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I am trying to run netmap-based ipfw with real NICs
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> there are some drivers that does not support netmap yet.
>>>
>>
>> =E2=80=8Bthanks for the answer but it wasn't that, i spoke to Mahnaz
>> and he was just running out of memory, as dmesg showed.
>>
>> cheers
>> luigi
>> =E2=80=8B
>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------=
-
>>  Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it  . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
>>  http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/        . Universita` di Pisa
>>  TEL      +39-050-2211611               . via Diotisalvi 2
>>  Mobile   +39-338-6809875               . 56122 PISA (Italy)
>> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------=
-
>>
>
>