From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jan 5 20:32:15 2001 From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 20:32:14 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mailg.telia.com (mailg.telia.com [194.22.194.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138E337B400 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from servus.telia.com (h174n4fls1o95.telia.com [213.64.31.174]) by mailg.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA04876; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 05:32:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from algol (dilbert.egnell.net [192.168.0.30]) by servus.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA27112; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 05:06:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from charlie.root@telia.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 05:06:31 +0100 (CET) From: charlie.root@telia.com Message-Id: <200101060406.FAA27112@servus.telia.com> X-Sender: lars@servus Return-Receipt-To: charlie.root@telia.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: kern/23535: 4.x kernels seem to no longer support Adaptec 1542CP SCSI Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 23:19 2001-01-04 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> >>Whats the difference between a 1542CP (yours) and a 1542CF (mine)? > >I don't actually know. Firmware, I expect. > FYI: The model differences are AFAIK as follows: CP is plug&play, CF is strapless (software setup), other 1540/42 models are strapped. >Also, the CP model has an integrated floppy controller. I don't think >that the other sub-models of the 1542 have that. > Mine (1542CF) has. AFAIK 1542/1742/2742 have floppy controllers, whereas 1540/1740/2740 models don't. Lars E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message