From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 13:37:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EC16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:37:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2B943D4C for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:37:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@oook.cz) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])i5OD8acO078575; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:08:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@oook.cz) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5OD8a6S078574; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:08:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@oook.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@oook.cz using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: conrads@cox.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1088082515.73702.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:08:35 +0200 cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is pan2 an orphaned port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:37:49 -0000 V =E8t, 24. 06. 2004 v 15:05, Conrad J. Sabatier p=ED=B9e: > >> Incidentally, has any thought/discussion been given to including a > >> "gnome-devel" line of ports in the collection? > >=20 > > If you're referring to odd release lines of GNOME itself (like 2.5, > > 2.7 ..) there is a actively maintained set of ports outside of main > > CVS repository. Check http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html >=20 > Yes, I've seen that. I was just curious if there was any possibility > of incorporating the devel ports into the ports collection tree. No > big thing, really. :-) That would be extremely inconvenient to maintain. Existing approach works pretty good, OTOH. --=20 Pav Lucistnik "Well, she turned me into a newt!" "A newt?" "I got better."