From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 08:08:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997F116A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:08:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from einet.bg (sonata3.bginter.net [217.79.32.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EA243D5D for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:08:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tie@einet.bg) Received: from root by einet.bg with scanned-ok (Exim 4.21) id 1AhWWL-0001Tc-80 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:08:29 +0200 Received: from [217.79.34.250] (helo=filipov) by einet.bg with smtp (Exim 4.21) id 1AhWWH-0001TA-B3; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:08:25 +0200 Message-ID: <00aa01c3dc4b$1275e500$6e00a8c0@filipov> From: "Emil Filipov" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" References: <009401c3dc3c$1fa680e0$6e00a8c0@filipov> <20040116144135.GA92854@cell.sick.ru> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:09:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:08:06 -0000 > E> As you can see the client does not agree with MRU of 1488 (I tried initially with the default of 1492). Bug in RASPPPOE implementation? > G> Surely. One more person faced this bug. :) G> G> On PPPoE ACes I use a patched mpd, where MRU negotiation is commented out. G> You should send a bug report to Robert Schlabbach, RASPPPoE's author. I G> always forget to do it :) OK, I have patched (commented) the MRU problem. Now I'm able to successfully connect to the server. But guess what happens when I connect with mppe? I get about half the speed compared to connection without encryption.. Top says that I have plenty of hardware resources free. How about that?Could this be a VLAN issue? Regards, Emil Filipov