From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Oct 9 23:40:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764E537B401; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D999143E3B; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:40:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021010064017.HDOS20316.sccrmhc03.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 06:40:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA49889; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:38:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Jeff Roberson , Luigi Rizzo , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scheduler patch, ready for commit. In-Reply-To: <200210100446.g9A4k6kx026651@intruder.bmah.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > > > > well, you said you posted it just to get feedback, and now in 24 hours > > > you declare it "ready for commit". A bit rushing, aren't you! > > > > Perhaps I wasn't clear. I was looking for an indication of whether or not > > this was something people were interested in having in for 5.0. I'm not > > going to rush the commit but by declaring it to be of a sufficient quality > > for commiting I was hoping to scare more poeple into reviewing it. ;-) > > Let me just briefly don my RE team member hat and say that for right > now, I'm much more interested in seeing commits to make CURRENT more > stable, rather than seeing people add lots of new functionality. > Remember that we're targeting a release in less than two months. It's > not going to be possible to make CURRENT perfect by then, but we need to > avoid making this process more complicated by adding loads of new > features, especially in the area of something as fundamental as the > scheduler. > > This is not a comment on the quality of your work. I freely admit that > I'm not qualified to review it. THIS change only moves stuff around, but it allows people to write replacement parts. It'd be good to have the frameowrk in 5.0 so people can use 5.0 as a scheduler testbed. > > Bruce. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message