Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 09:06:37 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something fishy with our PT_ATTACH code! Message-ID: <229.830534797@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Apr 1996 09:03:40 PDT." <199604261603.JAA13098@kithrup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It doesn't seem that the detached process is suspending itself so much as it > is simply renotifying the parent that it is still stopped. This could be > wrong behaviour, however. > > To change that, in the PT_DETACH code, a > > psignal(p, SIGCONT); > > would do the trick. I think ;). Well, it seems to me that we should really restore the process's previous state - what if it was suspended to start with? :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?229.830534797>