From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 26  1:58:36 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A959714F6E
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 01:57:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 10GK0G-000IiV-00; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:56:16 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com>
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IDE CDROM not found with PIIX4 chipset, -current kernel 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:27:52 +0900."
             <36D64CF8.997C55F9@newsguy.com> 
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:56:16 +0200
Message-ID: <71924.920022976@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:27:52 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:

> It was somehow distressing, though, that the new code had the exact
> same bug as the old, even though it was quite different code.

When you say "the new code", are you referring to the newer acd driver
as opposed to the older wcd driver? If so, do you think it'll be worth
my while trying to mangle into the acd code your diffs against the wcd
code?

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message