Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:39:26 -0600
From:      "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: posix has been rendered useless, isn't it?
Message-ID:  <549705CE.1050108@hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141221175658.3d574a88.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <20141221155635.GA1388@aio> <20141221175658.3d574a88.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/21/14 10:56, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:26:37 +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>> i have been studying the unix way of doing things,
>> i.e. tool-chaining to combine small programs for
>> accomplishing a solution.
> A noble goal.
>
>
>
>> but, almost none of today's servers built for any
>> of today's unix-like systems adhere to the unix
>> philosophy. most of them instead, are large
>> applications.
> The creation of monolithic applications can be a
> problem sometimes. It's often being accellerated
> by GUI paradigms where "one big program" is, often
> on the basic of object oriented programming (and
> the typical misunderstandings and misconceptions
> of that orientation), being "required" - you simply
> cannot easily apply the UNIX principles here.
>

Correctly applied OOP is (kinda) an extension of the UNIX philosophy 
.... Well designed/documented/implemented objects can be assembled into 
useful (compiled) programs readily & quickly. Incorrectly applied, or 
crappy objects & you have a mess ....


<snip>

-- 

	William A. Mahaffey III

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?549705CE.1050108>