From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 21:40:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879416A41F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1911343D8F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jALLeKAS090054 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jALLeKsM090053; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <200511212140.jALLeKsM090053@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Cc: Subject: Re: misc/89257: Previous version compatibility in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:40:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/89257; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: Me Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/89257: Previous version compatibility in 6.0 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:38:58 -0500 --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:14:58PM +0000, Me wrote: > It seems apps compiled against version 5.0 of FreeBSD are not > compatible with 6.0 out of the box and to me this isn't good. I can > still run windows applications written well over 15 years ago > unmodified on my PC out of the box and without running through > hoops. The "recompile defense" is unacceptable as the source code > is not always avaliable and more importantly users must not be > expected to care. Did you forget to install the compat5x libraries? Either way, this PR is quite incomplete since you forgot to give any details of your problem. Kris --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDgj5yWry0BWjoQKURAnSCAJ9wv8ZCMbiNnnKBXYroz87R4VQungCcDRH9 kvNHKUReHxkVGsJZdWujr88= =MNmS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--