From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  5 01:32:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA29409
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca8-36.ix.netcom.com [207.93.141.164])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA29401
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.6/8.6.9) id BAA15988; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708050832.BAA15988@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, helbig@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De, andreas@klemm.gtn.com,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199708050759.RAA27445@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Tue, 5 Aug 1997 17:29:53 +0930 (CST))
Subject: Re: Current is currently really a mess (was: Re: Tk/Tcl broken(?))
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I don't want to sound like I'm coming down on anyone here, but if the 
 * ports stuff was set up to be less intertwingled with the base system,
 * this wouldn't be so much of an issue.

Well, that is the crux of the problem.  I am currently working on
that.  (The shared library is the largest problem here...the rest is
not that hard if we choose to ignore tcl in the base system.)

Satoshi