From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 19 09:29:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD6106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:29:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net)
Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC0A8FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:29:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
	s=fsm; 
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
	bh=aIiJbcYuNxQWQ7KYr1p+zEPO5XHCBHgAwYMfRztS7gs=; 
	b=MsteAdXpymPAzkWKF7zpHpubvVPa3x4zv2g7wOFd7eqfpynwOr80A1ltT8VryPaRAV+Wu/DtjWnsR6i0gRuF+CvffHxStM962tbh2eOlAIRZiEqOnaPE6v+4wYphpgd72j7TLc8PBZkWBVogGeeafR4LjRIAWT9yw4mVvXcVZWo=;
Received: from [46.185.0.73] (helo=localhost)
	by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1QMzVd-0008eZ-RZ
	; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:27:11 +0300
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:29:08 +0300
From: Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
To: Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110519122908.6fcb818d@ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <867h9nf766.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20110518222045.76d9719d@ukr.net> <867h9ngo7f.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20110519102602.2929cd77@ukr.net> <867h9nf766.fsf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:29:12 -0000

=D0=92 Thu, 19 May 2011 12:04:01 +0400
Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:

> Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net> writes:
>=20
> > =D0=92 Thu, 19 May 2011 11:10:44 +0400
> > Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> >
> >> Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net> writes:
> >>=20
> >> > I have the system FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r222032 amd64
> >> >
> >> > Port devel/libdispatch well constructed and works, why he:
> >> > libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X. ?
> >> >
> >> > .if ${OSVERSION} >=3D 900000 && ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64"
> >> > BROKEN=3D         does not link on 9.X
> >> > .endif
> >>=20
> >> Could it be because 9.x after /head@r218822 contains binutils-2.17
> >> while per ports/146558 and ports/155157 only binutils-2.15 doesn't
> >> exhibit linking error due to failed PIC check? See my followup in
> >> ports/155157 for possible workarounds.
> >>
> >>   http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9.201104110=
61440/libdispatch-174.log
> >
> > Oh yeah - I forgot to add that build the port with the option
> > WITHOUT_CLANG=3Dyes
> > Maybe it makes sense to make the option WITHOUT_CLANG =3D yes by
> > default?
>=20
> Why if it's easy to fix CLANG option? See below
>=20

I do not understand ...

If there is a ready solution to the problem - what prevents it to
remove the problem in devel/libdispatch?