From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 25 17:17:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA15533 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:17:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA15520 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sjx-ca124-48.ix.netcom.com [207.223.162.176]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA22271; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id RAA13740; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199809260016.RAA13740@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu CC: obrien@NUXI.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu) Subject: Re: /usr/ports/filesystems From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone else has opinions on this? I sort of like "filesys", it's not ambiguous and looks nice sitting in the same directory with "sysutils".... :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message