From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 06:09:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D9916A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.doruk.net.tr (smtp.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CB743FD7 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:09:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from VAHOXP (vahric.doruk.net.tr [212.58.13.17]) by smtp.doruk.net.tr (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAHEKVNc028374; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:20:31 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:09:07 +0200 Message-ID: <029b01c3ad14$5e53b080$110d3ad4@VAHOXP> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: <1069074217.677.35.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:09:59 -0000 Ok , I want to test it if possible Could you check my design .. Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.2) Mydns x.x.x.3 ( database ) Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.1) Bind9 ( secondary ) in this environment ; My customers will use x.x.x.2 and x.x.x.1 for recursive query to solve local Domains and other domains which out side of us... and when customers want to register (take) new domain name they will give a dns server x.x.x.3-Mydns .. And which one is better using secondary bind9 or replicated Mydns ... Vahric -----Original Message----- From: Simon Dick [mailto:simond@irrelevant.org] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:04 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database MyDNS doesn't do recursive lookups so yes, you will need a seperate name server for that. My work has been using MyDNS for over a year now and we're hosting over 50k domains with it with no problems, we use a replicated MySQL setup to run more than one name server with a local db for speed. Hope that helps somewhat. On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:45, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > How many domains are you handling with it ?! and How long do you > use MyDNS ?! > > And Do you say I have to use two seperate DNS server for solving > other domains instead MyDNS server handled domains ?! I mean I will add > domains to MyDNS and My customers will use to resolve something > different DNS Servers ?! > > Thanks > Vahric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Gray [mailto:simong@desktop-guardian.com] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:44 PM > To: Vahric MUHTARYAN; freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database > > > Are anybody use BIND with Mysql database (BIND DNS 9 server which > > supports a MySQL backend ) any suggstion ?!!! Do you it's working > stable > > or not ?! > > > > Port name: bind9-sdb-mysql-9.2.2_1 > > > My i suggest giving MyDNS a look (http://mydns.bboy.net/) > > > MyDNS is a free DNS server for UNIX implemented from scratch and > designed to > serve records directly from an SQL database (currently either MySQL or > PostgreSQL). > > > Easy to setup, easy to use. > I've been using it a while, seems to work well. (doesn't however include > a > resolver/cache, however these should be seperate from your name servers > with > the host files anyway - bind/tinydns could be run on a seperate machine > for > a resolver without any problems). > > /usr/ports/dns/mydns/ > > Hope this helps, > > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >