From owner-freebsd-qa Fri Sep 20 12:58:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E6E37B401; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rtp-msg-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-msg-core-1.cisco.com [161.44.11.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006D243E3B; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:58:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Received: from goblet.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rtp-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8KJwgcX021162; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:58:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover-pc.cisco.com [161.44.149.69]) by goblet.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ABU31025; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:58:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8KK08jC003293; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:00:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Message-Id: <200209202000.g8KK08jC003293@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: "Brian J. McGovern" , freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG, bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com Subject: Re: Initial 4.7 RC1 report... In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:09:54 PDT." <200209201909.g8KJ9s3U021504@intruder.bmah.org> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:00:08 -0400 From: "Brian J. McGovern" Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > The install went pretty well. Without the package collection, picking the > > X installation options obviously break at that the point. > > Hmmm. Trust me, even if I gave you the package set, it wouldn't have > helped. :-( We plan to have this fixed for 4.7-RC2. > Ok. > > There is an issue with one of the dependencies for the Linux 7.1 emulator not > > building. I'll post a log once I verify it, but being a clean machine, it > > shouldn't have had problems. > > You mean building the emulators/linux_base port? Or rebuilding the > linux.ko module? > The linux_base port. I haven't tried the module, yet. > > The ahc driver seems fairly stable, but seems to run slower than previous > > versions. Again, this requires deeper inspection before I can claim its > > anything real. I have some Seagate 10,000 RPM drives an LVD 80MB/s bus, > > and I've managed so far to _max_ the drives out at 3MB/s. Sustained was > > around 0.8-1.0 MB/s. However, these numbers come from performing 'typical' > > user tasks that anything trying to really isolate or stress the drives (or ev > > en > > be efficient). > > Hmmm. Justin Gibbs would probably like to see some of your numbers. > As soon as I have something reasonable, I'll send them along. However, I can punch holes in my own testing, so I don't think we're ready. > > Overall, however, it seems pretty solid for the time spent on it. Usually > > I find a couple of gotchas by now. The only thing I'd really like to see i s > > Linux Redhat 7.3 being brought in to the emulator, so I can try to run a > > Lotus Dominio server on it :) > > Ask on emulation@? I haven't a clue what'd be involved (it almost > certainly won't happen for 4.7-RELEASE, but you knew that already). > Of course. Thats why its merely a wish :) -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message