From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 21 03:53:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E44C16A4D1
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F069143D48
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:53:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 15905 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2005 03:53:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
  by unknown with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 03:53:15 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:53:14 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>
In-Reply-To: <1108955636.624.16.camel@spirit>
Message-ID: <20050220215211.T1739@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <200502200802.j1K82G2M003470@repoman.freebsd.org> 
 <20050220231711.GA8172@VARK.MIT.EDU> <1108955636.624.16.camel@spirit>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/fsck_ffs fsck.h pass5.c src/sys/ufs/ffs
 ffs_alloc.c ffs_softdep.c fs.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:53:18 -0000


On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Xin LI wrote:

> Hmm...   Maybe we should add some constraint on this, for example, for
> volumes that fssize < 20G do the recomputation at mount time, despite
> the vfs.ffs.compute_summary_at_mount setting?  I think the situation
> only happens when bgfsck have not finished the scan yet, and on smaller
> volumes, this should not affect so much (after all, we can always set
> vfs.ffs.compute_summary_at_mount = 1 to restore the old behavior).

Seems like the volume size isn't the issue, it's the % of free space. 
Maybe do the recomputation if free space is < 15% or something.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack