From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 3 05:29:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA05385 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 05:29:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA05376 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 05:28:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA12679; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 05:16:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Andre Oppermann cc: Brett Glass , Wes Peters , James Love , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Oct 1998 14:11:46 +0200." <36161482.7373B67E@pipeline.ch> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 05:16:05 -0700 Message-ID: <12675.907416965@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Yea, and it seems that Jordans "a better Linux than Linux" doesn't work > either. Take a look on the license restrictions of the recently released Please don't put words in my mouth. At no point have I ever said or suggested that FreeBSD is or should be "a better Linux than Linux." The only thing I've come out in strong vocal support of is the linux binary emulation code, which hardly constitutes the same thing. You can run an OS's binaries without sharing a single other characteristic of its implementation. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message