Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:24:43 -0200 From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> To: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multimedia/gstreamer; proposal to make installation of GObject Introspection data optional Message-ID: <e71790db0912210824k330364e5obf5438c195fb3d0c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.u5aostng9aq2h7@localhost> References: <e71790db0912210607q32ed965dg41bdaa439dd4ad3a@mail.gmail.com> <op.u5aostng9aq2h7@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:07:27 -0600, Carlos A. M. dos Santos > <unixmania@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm attemting to reduce the number of dependences of several ports, in >> order to enable a low footprint installation of FreeBSD for embedded >> systems and kiosks. One of my intermediate goals is removing the >> runtime dependence on Python and several GNOME/KDE-specific features. >> During this work I found that gstreamer can be installed without >> Python if built without support for Introspection. So I poropose the >> following patch: >> >> diff -durP ../ports/multimedia/gstreamer/Makefile >> multimedia/gstreamer/Makefile > > <snip> >> >> What do you, multimedia maintainers, think? Is it acceptable? > > Disagree, I think this port should be split into multimedia/gstreamer and > multimedia/gstreamer-gir (or pick some better name?). To avoid break other > ports' dependency. I see. I will attempt to find which packages depend on the -gir part of gstreamer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e71790db0912210824k330364e5obf5438c195fb3d0c>