From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 14 14:58:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19A8106566B
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCB98FC12
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1127061lah.13
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:58:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=7M+4TvZvN6ZtBTpf0NNjBqemAm9w/8G3HSiBAvYkuNA=;
	b=myoF4mJDBOAJWTtrZFPQd1y3pov8sivb7CnCqon1q3r2PdhZAKiZU6ndO5dRydygmk
	QKXDUeGvFdVkQt4bMyWIVEfWM2+GvvHrdEOls/LHRFrSfPY0+DT7B3MDIM85sk1YQPXq
	6tPRpRUMOHgqS69vPIV0y+jkCSgNEuurnDSfQ=
Received: by 10.152.144.133 with SMTP id sm5mr2427785lab.38.1326551215305;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.18.227 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<20120113224506.0000765f@unknown>
	<4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:26:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnEnyzLnTCU4Z5tVJJuGrkhL4FFnnv95RzfQDSBE9JJFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: perryh@pluto.rain.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Alexander@leidinger.net, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au
Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:04 -0000

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:36 AM,  <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:
>
>> For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by
>> several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain
>> them (more people are always welcome ;-) ).
>
> and yet, having a port maintained by ports@ -- which is quite
> a large group -- tends _not_ to be considered a good thing :)

A maintainer of "ports@freebsd.org" is an exception. It correctly
means that there is NO maintainer, not that the entire mailing list
maintains it.


-- 
Eitan Adler