From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Sep 6 14:11:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371BE14BFF for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA72271; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: John Baldwin Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: explosion in FAQ this morning.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Sep 1999 12:46:14 EDT." <0FHN0074AD8VPA@gkar.cc.vt.edu> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 14:09:59 -0700 Message-ID: <72267.936652199@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > This is when making a release on the 3.3-STABLE (erm, RC :) branch. > > Umm..you should not be doing anything in /usr/doc/FAQ. That directory > should be cvs-remove'd by now. The FAQ is supposed to be built in > /usr/doc//books/faq/. Again, this is a make release. If there's a /usr/doc/FAQ there, it's because the `cvs co doc' checked one out. :) All release builds start with a blank slate, as it were, and if there are components which shouldn't be there, directories which shouldn't exist or build failures which occur, it's all due to some problem in the doc sources, the mtree templates or src/release/Makefile, not a procedural error. The stuff in src/release/Makefile is also pretty straight-forward so I tend to suspect that it's one of the others. > Is your /usr/doc/Makefile up to date? It should be revision 1.14 or > later, and should include doc.subdir.mk at the bottom. I'll check this just to verify it, but since I'm now building with NODOC=YES in all my tests just so I can get a test snapshot out, I'll have to restart my build first. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message