From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 22 09:12:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 80DF616A4CE; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [217.157.39.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7C14D43D31; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tobez@tobez.org)
Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E6075125468; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:12:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:12:55 +0100
From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>
To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Message-ID: <20050322091255.GB21666@heechee.tobez.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>,
	Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org>,
	Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br>, sem@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
	<20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Powered-By: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/
cc: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br>
cc: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org>
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: sem@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:58 -0000

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:08:10PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:49:11AM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > So I'd like to suggest to rename the existing mail/policyd to
> > mail/policyd-spf, for example.  It might be a good idea to rename the
> > new port to mail/policyd-somethingelse anyway, if we can come up with a
> > sufficiently descriptive (and short!) "somethingelse" part.
> 
> I would call them
>     mail/postfix-policyd
>     mail/postfix-policyd-spf
> 
> But that is what you said already.

More or less, but yes, the postfix- prefix is even better.

> If there are getting more which just are described as postfix
> "policyd" ports, just call them postfix-policyd-a, postfix-policyd-b
> and so on.

Well we already have mail/postgrey and mail/sqlgrey, which also use
policy daemon mechanism.  I would hate to rename them to
mail/postfix-policyd-greylist-db and mail/postfix-policyd-greylist-sql,
though.  :-)

\Anton.
-- 
The moronity of the universe is a monotonically increasing function. --
Jarkko Hietaniemi