From owner-cvs-ports Sun May 3 17:59:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA07761 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 17:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA07738; Sun, 3 May 1998 17:59:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA26455; Sun, 3 May 1998 20:59:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 20:59:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Eivind Eklund cc: Matthew Hunt , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <19980503230438.48318@follo.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 3 May 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > Should't this be under ATT (for "Automated Theft Tool")? ;-) > > Refusing to download ads from the WWW is very bad practice. Those ads are > paying for the service you're using. I'm not even certain we should have > the above program as a port - I don't think we'd have a 'automated > crack-on-download' tool, for instance, and this is actually fairly similar. I strongly disagree. The only reason I have a problem with banners is that they break caching at times and are hosted on separate sites than the content and often stall the loading of the web page. I'm on a 28.8 with 3 other people and about 8 to 16 systems. The last thing I need is some lame ass animated GIF banner cloging my line. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */