Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:49:33 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: LEGAL variable to capture generic issues Message-ID: <515063FD.1090008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkv2STyoGuzB-FLr9FX3zgaZxCTZrb5Tu__e-sdRQwB1A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgn1zN_5Gz_2Zrg7W==Q7SuLcXeWta0EE1Zkjq_jsPwtpg@mail.gmail.com> <515052EB.30409@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=DaYc_68AS-4-T6pJv1impWdB6Tv73m5Ld1W6nZuLQNg@mail.gmail.com> <51505A60.8070809@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgnReoHLA0w6FAwB8KRnrx0dhCgTz%2B-avPtDODEvn3E%2B4w@mail.gmail.com> <51506111.5030402@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgkv2STyoGuzB-FLr9FX3zgaZxCTZrb5Tu__e-sdRQwB1A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eitan Adler ha scritto: > This is insufficient to include, say, line 212: > > "raknet-* devel/raknet Original license is > Indy license, special authorization granted to provide RakNet under > GPL v3" Ehmm, I could argue about the private email permission, but if it's listed in LEGAL it should be marked as RESTRICTED or NO_CDROM, otherwise it should not listed there (the LICENSE framework already says that special authorization has been granted). -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?515063FD.1090008>