From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 10 13:28: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C559337B401 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruminary.org (chiku.ruminary.org [216.218.185.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9548A43ED1 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:28:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@ruminary.org) Received: by ruminary.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EE8222E19; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:28:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:28:01 -0800 From: clark shishido To: current@freebsd.org Subject: df and amd expected behavior Message-ID: <20021210212801.GA11569@ruminary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG under 4-STABLE I get the up-till-now behavior where a df -k shows you amd's pid, pid@hostname:/mountpoint under 5-CURRENT it won't show up unless I type df -ak. is the behavior in 5.0 correct? df's man page says: "-a Show all mount points, including those that were mounted with the MNT_IGNORE flag." so the answer is very probably, yes. but, some people will confuse expected vs correct so it should be mentioned in the release notes. also, since there's a df -l option PR27319 can be closed. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/27319 --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message