From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 8 14:35:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C49816BA1B; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay1.beelinegprs.ru (relay1.beelinegprs.ru [217.118.71.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B39F43D48; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:30:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1 (Postfix) with SMTP id D758036DB2; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:30:42 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.19.118.183] (clusterfw.beelinegprs.ru [217.118.66.232]) by relay1.beelinegprs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E652C36FEF; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:30:35 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <44881863.2040008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:30:27 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060429) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <1903867106.20060607001337@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4485E6AE.9070208@FreeBSD.org> <44868D3C.4040102@FreeBSD.org> <44869E97.5090608@FreeBSD.org> <20060607214537.GA40788@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060607214537.GA40788@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamtest-Info: License expired Cc: Lev Serebryakov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:35:40 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > FYI, you might like to check out the 'makeparallel' pointyhat script > (in /usr/ports/Tools). This takes an INDEX as input and spits out an > enormous makefile with all dependencies enumerated, so you can just > use make -j for parallel builds in correct dependency order. You > wouldn't have to construct the full makefile, only the subset > corresponding to the ports that are going to be updated. > > You'd still need mutual exclusion around e.g. the pkgdb, but you > wouldn't have to add mutual exclusion throughout bsd.port.mk since > make guarantees there will be none (if the index is accurate). I going to add locking for in next version. So 'makeparallel' script could be useful. -- Dixi. Sem.