Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:48:39 +0300
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        perl@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile
Message-ID:  <400C2687.1000401@ciam.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040119163126.GA4722@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <200401191015.i0JAF9iR071128@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119163126.GA4722@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:

> WHY??  rc scripts live in <PREFIX>/etc/rc.d peroid.

Take a look at mail/exim. I don't know what is absolute true way. But 
IMHO people can feel free to chooce where scripts may be placed.

> Please make this port always ahear to our standards.  There is no need to
> make ever little thing overrideable as that will only encourage people to
> try to do weird things we don't support.

We are not supported rcNG?

> Also it is well known that one can turn off a packages's rc script by
> renaming the rc script such that it doesn't have a ".sh" extention.  It
> is our defacto standard that packages rc scripts have ".sh" as their
> extention, again please don't encourage a wide sweaping change.

Be modern. You need only change spamd_enable="YES" to no, or remove it. 
Why do you think file renaming is better? And the file doesn't deinstall 
is you rename it.

---
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400C2687.1000401>