From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 17 06:33:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F62A85812 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882E51BF4 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (cpe-071-065-239-148.nc.res.rr.com [71.65.239.148] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u0H6XGiw033089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:33:28 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Rubygem .js files fubar? To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <5693DB57.7090407@freebsd.org> <5694DF6C.3000204@infracaninophile.co.uk> <569B2D66.2070006@FreeBSD.org> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: <569B35AC.2060600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 01:33:16 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569B2D66.2070006@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:33:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:33:31 -0000 On 01/17/16 12:57 AM, Steve Wills wrote: > > As for why the original file isn't deleted, I'm not sure. I don't see > this in my local tree, but I have some changes that may be masking it. > Oh, I wasn't seeing it because I was testing with Ruby 2.1 and it only happens with Ruby 2.2 (and presumably 2.3). I'll look into that. Steve