Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 18:13:24 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uqs@freebsd.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r228990 - in head/usr.sbin: IPXrouted adduser bluetooth/btpand bluetooth/sdpd bootparamd/bootparamd bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge bsnmpd/modules/snmp_hostres bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan bsnmp... Message-ID: <20120101171324.GM83814@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20111230204653.Y31442@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <201112301058.pBUAwFsw010478@svn.freebsd.org> <CAK2BMK6p3VJXezt%2Bpa7-0MbP4=Uv79i=D=cxmDrpAwUK2Mw2vQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111230204653.Y31442@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry for the delay. On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 20:50:16 +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Ben Kaduk wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Modified: head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt > >> ============================================================================== > >> --- head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt Fri Dec 30 10:45:00 2011 (r228989) > >> +++ head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt Fri Dec 30 10:58:14 2011 (r228990) > >> @@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ WlanMgmtReasonCode ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTIO > >> associationLeave(8), > >> associationNotAuthenticated(9), > >> -- XXX: TODO - FIXME > >> - dissasocPwrcapBad(10), > >> - dissasocSuperchanBad(11), > >> + disassocPwrcapBad(10), > >> + disassocSuperchanBad(11), > > > >This file looks like it might be intended to be machine-readable -- I > >would worry about changing it without test/review. > >Perhaps this spelling "error" is even the reason for the XXX comment above. > > Absolutely. If there is a spelling error in an SNMP MIB outside comments > or description strings it must stay there. Otherwise applications reading > that file will break. > > This is also true for the corresponding .def file. > > harti Neither Google, Bing nor Google Code Search can find any occurrence of any of the two words in either spelling, except in our tree, of course. This leads me to believe that at least no known Open Source project will be affected by the change. But that doesn't say much. Is this a non-backwards compatible change that we can do when going from 9.x to 10.0? I'm fine with backing it out, too, if you think this will actually break anything for third parties. Just say the word. Thanks Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120101171324.GM83814>