From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 14:44:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FDD106566B; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E73F8FC15; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5022:4efd:b73a:4846] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5022:4efd:b73a:4846]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBIEiWo9001744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:44:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D0CC8CD.7070605@sentex.net> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:44:29 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4D0C49A2.4000203@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D0C49A2.4000203@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrade BIND version in RELENG_7 to BIND 9.6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:44:35 -0000 On 12/18/2010 12:41 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > > I am particularly interested in feedback from users with significant DNS > usage that are still using 9.4, especially if you're using the version > in the base. I would appreciate it if you could install 9.6 from the > ports and at minimum run /usr/local/sbin/named-checkconf to see if any > errors are generated. Of course it would be that much more helpful if > you could also evaluate BIND 9.6 in operation in your environment. Its significant to us, but not compared to large orgs usage wise:) IFF we had to make any config changes on this end we would view it as work that would eventually need to be done regardless. That being said, the new named-checkconf seems happy on our main servers (~2,000 zones each) so we would welcome this update to RELENG_7. ---Mike