From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 01:21:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A2416A401 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 01:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476EA43D45 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 01:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so1800746wxc for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eAZOAseXRPcjqc1tMQ3mjRyTYgCsgM5ksHEDXFcxGyqXwIpbYRZCw5aEoqpd6hQ75DX3vgrwsQbDHbHZlevmeOud+sQHCb8ylO0ctDUGHt2nh+tjNET9BNCGqHUe3HQqYLCr2CQK3j9MK1mkgw9TaH7C7lrG24kq8qAl71PRLNc= Received: by 10.70.74.16 with SMTP id w16mr231518wxa; Mon, 01 May 2006 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.76.10 with HTTP; Mon, 1 May 2006 18:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20605011821v5e6a51c2i458af940512cf42@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:21:26 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20605011820w314d8852t231e65bfebf5f6e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <80f4f2b20605011644r87563a0r9141d4a62a28b98b@mail.gmail.com> <20060502000409.GZ81777@wantadilla.lemis.com> <80f4f2b20605011820w314d8852t231e65bfebf5f6e6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: dd issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 01:21:27 -0000 On 5/1/06, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 1 May 2006 at 19:44:00 -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote: > > I'm trying to back up some of my software, and I'm having some > > problems, I found something in the archives specifying the need to set > > a block size of 2k or greater. This makes a backup (I've not tested it > > yet). > > > > My questions are: > > (1) Why does this work? > > Why shouldn't it? Because the alternative does not work (default block size, block size less than 2k). > > > (2) Is it possible that not using the default/found block size will > > cause issues? > > Yes. > > Without more background in what you're trying to do (you don't even > say what backup program or what medium you're trying to back up to), > or what your concerns are, it's difficult to answer this question. > There are no specific issues with block size on most archivers, but in > general large block sizes (64 kB or larger) will give better > performance. program is dd, source medium is CD, destination medium is hard drive. Possible later medium is compressed files on HD DVD-RW