From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 11:49:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326DE16A41C; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E407E43D55; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A6D31814C; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:49:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6CFB2405B; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:49:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:49:51 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20050629114950.GC49933@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050626211011.GH1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <86d5q8113a.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050627130449.GQ1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42C0026C.3040000@FreeBSD.org> <20050627191205.GT1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1119900416.27663.15.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050629083042.GB48704@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050629110805.W74117@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050629110805.W74117@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenPAM Figwort broke PAM modules from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:49:41 -0000 Hi Robert, > Could you propose specific text to add to UPDATING, and I'll drop it in? > Perhaps something along the lines of the following: > > Some previous versions of PAM have permitted the use of > non-absolute paths in /etc/pam.conf or /etc/pam.d/* when referring > to third party PAM modules in /usr/local/lib. A change has been > made to require the use of absolute paths in order to avoid > ambiguity and dependence on library path configuration, which may > affect existing configurations. This is perfect. Thank you very much. Best regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >