From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Aug 6 23:26:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39B337BD03; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 23:26:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9520D1C5C; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 02:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 02:26:15 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Nick Sayer Cc: Robert Watson , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: vmware changes result in nasty bridging mess Message-ID: <20000807022615.K95620@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <398E0DC8.745E02F9@quack.kfu.com> <20000806224528.H95620@jade.chc-chimes.com> <398E52AB.5CAA967B@quack.kfu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <398E52AB.5CAA967B@quack.kfu.com>; from nsayer@quack.kfu.com on Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 11:09:47PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 11:09:47PM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote: > > That's nice. If I didn't turn bridging on, I don't want it on. > > Then edit the script and turn it off rather than insisting that the > whole world do it the way you like it. Luckily, security sanity is on my side, so the rest of the world is just going to have to deal with it. > > On a side note, if I was a {ports ,}security officer, I would have already either > > commented out the offending lines or marked the port FORBIDDEN. > > Then we have a difference of opinion. Yep. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message