From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 7 23:30:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5761065692 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remodeler@alentogroup.org) Received: from courriel.marmotmail.com (courriel.marmotmail.com [85.17.36.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7548FC08 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bruce.epifora.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by courriel.marmotmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D0E2394FF for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:46:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bruce.epifora.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940A24761F9 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:44:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bruce.epifora.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bruce.epifora.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30034-02 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from alentogroup.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bruce.epifora.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3311E4761F8 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:44:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "remodeler" To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 19:44:06 -0400 Message-Id: <20091007234005.M40001@alentogroup.org> In-Reply-To: <4ACD1A29.4070207@elischer.org> References: <20091007002615.M76095@alentogroup.org> <4ACBF0ED.2070905@elischer.org> <20091007043721.M28730@alentogroup.org> <4ACC2536.9030701@elischer.org> <4ACCE73A.5000502@elischer.org> <20091007222310.M23322@alentogroup.org> <4ACD1A29.4070207@elischer.org> X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: can't find routing entry for network routes X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:30:42 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > so does this mean it's all working for you? Yes. Thank you. Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling socket and plug it in directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a userland tunneling socket and ng_socket?