From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 19 22:11:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA12246 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:11:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA12238 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:11:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id HAA25272 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:00:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id GAA02288; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:30:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19971120063014.22538@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:30:14 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Are we missing NFS with file locking ? Heard that NetBSD 1.3 should have Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi ! tron@lyssa.owl.de (Matthias Scheler) claimed on de.comp.os.unix that NetBSD 1.3 came with true NFS file locking support. Wasn't it something we are still missing, or am I wrong ? Should it be true, perhaps someone who has access to NetBSD sources could take a closer look into this ?! Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD''