Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 02:05:01 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/hs-zip-archive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-binary Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-darcs/files patch-Setup.lhs patch-darcs.cabal ports/devel/hs-darcs Makefile distinfo pkg-d Message-ID: <20100524220501.GF7380@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil2ds1NMcOVfF6_R3bCkIb1SPOnLMkagLWt90nk@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTil2ds1NMcOVfF6_R3bCkIb1SPOnLMkagLWt90nk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Gabor PALI (pgj@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > I think that's a very bad idea - hs- prefixes (as well as py-/p5- > > etc.) should not be applied to end-user applications, and this is > > a huge POLA violation. > > I was thinking about creating slave ports with the original name for > the "popular" ports. What do you think? What's the purpose for renaming them at all? In the first place, those are end-user applications named darcs, xmonad etc., so ports should be named darcs and xmonad correspondingly, regardless of language they're written in and regardless of whether they install modules for that language. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100524220501.GF7380>