From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep 26 03:56:43 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id DAA00987
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:56:43 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA00982
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:56:39 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id DAA20129; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:56:37 -0700
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:56:37 -0700
Message-Id: <199509261056.DAA20129@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199509231935.VAA22521@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 21:35:19 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: multiple mail messages
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

J writes:

 * The question has been (erroneously) sent to two lists in parallel in
 * the first place.  Nobody bothered to drop one of the lists from the
 * Cc.

Just in case you all forgot, I was the person who sent out the
original message.  I posted it to both hackers and ports, and clearly
labeled it as such and recommended that ensuing discussion take place
in ports.

Draw your own conclusions on who is to blame. :)

Satoshi