From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 23:59:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA66037B404 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postino.fi.infn.it (postino.fi.infn.it [192.84.145.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575A43F75 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:59:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Riccardo.Veraldi@fi.infn.it) Received: from dijkstra.fi.infn.it (dijkstra.fi.infn.it [192.84.145.13]) by postino.fi.infn.it (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3F6xC4k057461; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:59:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dijkstra.fi.infn.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFB2C36D81; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:59:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.fi.infn.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB0D30C01; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:59:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:59:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Riccardo.Veraldi@fi.infn.it X-X-Sender: fddi@dijkstra.fi.infn.it To: Sten In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020920) (postino.fi.infn.it) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.43 cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with UDMA mode on XP1000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 06:59:23 -0000 This is the performance with promise TX2 ATA100: 2MB/s PIO4 it is s shit much worse than Cypress It's impossible for me to go any better than PIO4 with fastrak, I tried 5 different set of ATA cables. Rick On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Sten wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > Riccardo.Veraldi@fi.infn.it writes: > > > for curiosity how muc hperform embedded IDE controller on XP1000, is it > > > worse than UDMA 33?? > > > > > > > Much worse. > > MAXTOR 6L080J4: > > Cypress 82C693 ATA controller : 6-8mb pio ( high cpu load ) > Promise TX2 ATA133 controller ( udma33 ) : 20mb udma > > -- > Sten Spans > > There is a crack in everything that's how the light gets in. >