Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:58:11 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: James Griffin <jmz@kontrol.kode5.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xorg without hal Message-ID: <20131211175811.9c300743.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131211154753.GB3251@kontrol.kode5.net> References: <20131211142143.GA2861@kontrol.kode5.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312110842170.2231@wonkity.com> <20131211154753.GB3251@kontrol.kode5.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:47:53 +0000, James Griffin wrote: > Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>: > > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, James Griffin wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to configure X with the need for hald? If I generate and configure an xorg.conf with the appropriate settings, can I turn hald off? > > > > Yes. It depends on the environment, AFAIK KDE and Gnome still want hal. > > xfce does not need it. > > Thanks Warren, I use fvwm2 so I guess that should be fine. It should be no problem. I'm using WindowMaker without HAL and DBUS, and I also use KDE and Gnome 2 applications. This works fine. Maybe even Xfce and LXDE can be used in such kind of setting. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131211175811.9c300743.freebsd>