Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 04:18:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261820] lang/mlton: Fix build on FreeBSD 14 and i386 Message-ID: <bug-261820-7788-H52lRtrOMh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261820-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261820-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261820 Timothy Beyer <beyert@cs.ucr.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #231671|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Timothy Beyer <beyert@cs.ucr.edu> --- Created attachment 233980 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D233980&action= =3Dedit lang_mlton.diff (build on poudriere, major fixes to address memory usage on 32-bit) I now have produced a far better patch that addresses the memory usage issu= es at compile time to the fullest extent possible, and has been extensively te= sted on poudriere and bhyve VMs. Based on extensive testing, shown below, and that I am the maintainer of the port, I would recommend getting it committed shortly with the new patch. Poudriere builds were tested on a FreeBSD 13.0 RELEASE amd64 host, with poudriere jails of FreeBSD 13.0 amd64, FreeBSD 12.2 amd64, FreeBSD 13.0 i386 and FreeBSD 12.2 i386) Note that 32-bit bhyve builds were tested on 3.0, 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8 and 4.= 0 gb of RAM on bhyve on FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE i386 and 13.0-RELEASE i386 for the simple reason that this would stress test the build more than poudriere, wh= ich is the easiest way to build. Finally, this has the potential to build on 14-CURRENT, unlike past revisio= ns. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261820-7788-H52lRtrOMh>